Radiocarbon 14 dating of the shroud of turin
The cloth has been kept at the cathedral since 1578.
Actually, the news is from 2013, but you probably still think it’s a medieval fake.
"The radiocarbon sample has completely different chemical properties than the main part of the shroud relic," said Mr Rogers, who is a retired chemist from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, US.
Fire damage He says he was originally dubious of untested claims that the 1988 sample was taken from a re-weave.
(Reported August 15, 2008, at the Ohio State University Shroud of Turin scientific conference).
To still accept the old carbon dating, we must also imagine that a comprehensive twelve page article in the scientific journal (Jul/Aug 2008) is simply wrong.
So much has happened in the twenty years since the shroud was carbon dated. That carbon dating exercise warrants more than a mild “some people question” attempt at balanced reporting. To still accept the carbon dating of the shroud, we must imagine that Robert Villarreal and his team of nine scientists at the prestigious Los Alamos National Laboratory were wrong when they showed that the carbon dating violated the first principle of carbon dating: the sample must represent the whole.The author dismisses 1988 carbon-14 dating tests which concluded that the linen sheet was a medieval fake.